Where every layer of smart money agrees loading…
The rare stocks where multiple independent signals point the same way at once — the “everything agrees” trades. Each is scored by how many of these 5 layers confirm:
📈 MarketFlow BUY signal · 🏛 Institutions accumulating (13F) · 👤 Insiders buying (Form 4) · 🚨 Activist stake (13D) · 🌊 Sector inflows (macro). Higher = rarer = higher conviction. Click any stock for the full breakdown.
📊 Does confluence actually work? 12-year backtest
A point-in-time backtest (2013–2026, 171,500 stock-quarters, PIT-hardened & re-validated 2026-06-12: late filings excluded, amendments deduped) of the 3 layers with deep history — trend (price above its 200-day MA, a proxy for the technical layer) × institutional accumulation (Δ shares) × insider buying. The more agree, the better the forward odds, monotonically. Forward 63-day return vs the market median:
✓ Monotonic ✓ Mostly beyond momentum (two factor controls: trend + trailing-quarter) ✓ Losses shown.
Honest scope ▾
This is a research / screening edge — high-confluence names have materially better forward odds.
It is not a trading strategy: traded naively it fails on costs, and the best lower-turnover construction nets
only ~+0.8%/yr over the liquid universe (in-sample; the original +1.9%/yr claim fell after fixing a momentum
leak in the accumulation layer and PIT-hardening the data — the ranking edge survived both fixes). Validated
on proxies of 3 of the 5 layers with 13y of SEC history (the backtest's technical layer is the 200-day-MA
trend, not the live MarketFlow signal); the rare 3-layer bucket is small-N (~2.2k) — quote the pattern, not exact
levels. Activist (13D) + Sector flows join the proof as their history accrues. Survivorship-limited to
liquid names. Research, not advice.